From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Taylor Vesely <tvesely(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Adam Lee <ali(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Melanie Plageman <mplageman(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation |
Date: | 2020-02-22 17:55:26 |
Message-ID: | 9759ab2d0c2c28a175e11efe1788d37dc7e1b768.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 12:22 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'd also like to apply something like 0013 from that thread, I find
> the
> whole curperagg, select_current_set, curaggcontext logic confusing as
> hell. I'd so far planned to put this on the backburner until this
> patch
> has been committed, to avoid breaking it. But perhaps that's not the
> right call?
At least for now, I appreciate you holding off on those a bit.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-02-22 18:00:20 | Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2020-02-22 17:51:16 | Re: POC: rational number type (fractions) |