Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Taylor Vesely <tvesely(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Adam Lee <ali(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Melanie Plageman <mplageman(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Date: 2020-02-22 17:55:26
Message-ID: 9759ab2d0c2c28a175e11efe1788d37dc7e1b768.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 12:22 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'd also like to apply something like 0013 from that thread, I find
> the
> whole curperagg, select_current_set, curaggcontext logic confusing as
> hell. I'd so far planned to put this on the backburner until this
> patch
> has been committed, to avoid breaking it. But perhaps that's not the
> right call?

At least for now, I appreciate you holding off on those a bit.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-02-22 18:00:20 Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2020-02-22 17:51:16 Re: POC: rational number type (fractions)