| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to use as Functional Index to be used as Primary KEY |
| Date: | 2004-08-02 14:05:23 |
| Message-ID: | 9742.1091455523@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
jseymour(at)linxnet(dot)com (Jim Seymour) writes:
> Janning Vygen <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de> wrote:
>> Thanks to Tom and Peter for your answers. I will design my table without a
>> primary key and use my unique index instead of a primary key. As this unique
>> key is the same as a primary key i dont see the reason why postgresql
>> should't extend the specs and allow functional primary key indizes.
> Because, as Tom Lane wrote: "The SQL spec says that primary keys are
> columns or lists of columns." Unlike some other SQL RDBMs, PostgreSQL
> at least *tries* (mostly) to be SQL standards compliant.
Or at least we try to pick our extensions carefully ;-). I don't see
the point of this one ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud | 2004-08-02 14:23:04 | Re: How to use as Functional Index to be used as Primary KEY |
| Previous Message | Michal Taborsky | 2004-08-02 13:50:25 | Re: I have some questions... |