From: | Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: to_timestamp TZH and TZM format specifiers |
Date: | 2018-01-08 00:22:08 |
Message-ID: | 9740c835-a76d-fb07-2d1e-84601f05ad4c@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03.01.2018 21:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> This small and simple standalone patch extracted from the SQL/JSON work
>> would allow the user to supply a string with a time zone specified as
>> hh:mm thus:
>> SELECT to_timestamp('2011-12-18 11:38 -05:20', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH12:MI
>> TZH:TZM');
>> to_timestamp
>> ------------------------------
>> Sun Dec 18 08:58:00 2011 PST
> I see that Oracle's to_timestamp supports these format codes, so +1
> if you've checked that the behavior is compatible with Oracle. The
> most obvious possible gotcha is whether + is east or west of GMT,
> but also there's formatting questions like what the field width is
> and whether leading zeroes are printed.
>
> Also, I'm unimpressed that you've not bothered to implement the
> to_char direction. That moves this from a feature addition to
> a kluge, IMO, especially since that ought to be the easier direction.
>
>
> BTW, I had not known this before, but according to the page I'm
> looking at
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/sql_elements004.htm#SQLRF00212
>
> Oracle also supports "TZD" to mean a time zone abbreviation (their
> example is "PDT") and "TZR" to mean a time zone name (their example
> is "US/Pacific", so yes they mean the IANA zone names). Those seem
> remarkably useful, so I'm surprised we've not added support for them.
>
>
>> The patch seems pretty straightforward to me, and it's required for the
>> jsonpath patches which would be the next cab off the rank in the
>> SQL/JSON work.
> I'm quite confused as to why a patch that alleges to be implementing
> SQL-standard behavior would be depending on an Oracle-ism. That's
> not an argument against this patch, but it is a question about the
> SQL/JSON work.
>
> regards, tom lane
TZH and TZM specifiers are required by standard for SQL/JSON item method
.datetime() (Feature F411, “Time zone specification”). To be fully
compliant, we should also support RR, RRRR and FF1-FF9 specifiers.
.datetime() item method is used for conversion of JSON string items to
SQL/JSON datetime items. Its optional argument "format" determines
target datetime type:
=# SELECT jsonb '"10-03-2017 12:34 +05:20"' @* '$.datetime("DD-MM-YYYY").type()';
?column?
----------
"date"
(1 row)
=# SELECT jsonb '"10-03-2017 12:34 +05:20"' @* '$.datetime("DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI").type()';
?column?
-------------------------------
"timestamp without time zone"
(1 row)
=# SELECT jsonb '"10-03-2017 12:34 +05:20"' @* '$.datetime("DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI TZH:TZM").type()';
?column?
----------------------------
"timestamp with time zone"
(1 row)
-- automatic datetime type recognition for ISO-formatted strings
=# SELECT jsonb '"2017-10-03 12:34:56 +05:20"' @* '$.datetime().type()';
?column?
----------------------------
"timestamp with time zone"
(1 row)
Here are corresponding excerpts from the SQL-2016 standard:
9.44 Datetime templates
<datetime template> ::=
{ <datetime template part> }...
<datetime template part> ::=
<datetime template field>
| <datetime template delimiter>
<datetime template field> ::=
<datetime template year>
| <datetime template rounded year>
| <datetime template month>
| <datetime template day of month>
| <datetime template day of year>
| <datetime template 12-hour>
| <datetime template 24-hour>
| <datetime template minute>
| <datetime template second of minute>
| <datetime template second of day>
| <datetime template fraction>
| <datetime template am/pm>
| <datetime template time zone hour>
| <datetime template time zone minute>
<datetime template delimiter> ::=
<minus sign>
| <period>
| <solidus>
| <comma>
| <apostrophe>
| <semicolon>
| <colon>
| <space>
<datetime template year> ::= YYYY | YYY | YY | Y
<datetime template rounded year> ::= RRRR | RR
<datetime template month> ::= MM
<datetime template day of month> ::= DD
<datetime template day of year> ::= DDD
<datetime template 12-hour> ::= HH | HH12
<datetime template 24-hour> ::= HH24
<datetime template minute> ::= MI
<datetime template second of minute> ::= SS
<datetime template second of day> ::= SSSSS
<datetime template fraction> ::=
FF1 | FF2 | FF3 | FF4 | FF5 | FF6 | FF7 | FF8 | FF9
<datetime template am/pm> ::= A.M. | P.M.
<datetime template time zone hour> ::= TZH
<datetime template time zone minute> ::= TZM
9.39 SQL/JSON path language: syntax and semantics
...
10) If <JSON datetime template> JDT is specified, then the value of JDT shall
conform to the lexical grammar of a <datetime template> in the Format of
Subclause 9.44, “Datetime templates”.
a) If JDT contains
<datetime template year>,
<datetime template rounded year>,
<datetime template month>,
<datetime template day of month>, or
<datetime template day of year>,
then JDT is dated.
b) If JDT contains
<datetime template 12-hour>,
<datetime template 24-hour>,
<datetime template minute>,
<datetime template second of minute>,
<datetime template second of day>,
<datetime template fraction>, or
<datetime template am/pm>,
then JDT is timed.
The fractional seconds precision FSP of JDT is
Case:
i) If JDT contains <datetime template fraction>
FF1, FF2, FF3, FF4, FF5, FF6, FF7, FF8, or FF9,
then 1 (one), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9, respectively.
ii) Otherwise, 0 (zero).
c) If JDT contains
<datetime template time zone hour> or
<datetime template time zone minute>,
then JDT is zoned.
d) If JDT is zoned, then JDT shall be timed.
e) JDT shall be dated or timed or both.
f) The implicit datetime data type IDT of JDT is
Case:
i) If JDT is dated, timed, and zoned, then TIMESTAMP (FSP) WITH TIME ZONE.
ii) If JDT is dated, timed, and not zoned, then
TIMESTAMP (FSP) WITHOUT TIME ZONE.
iii) If JDT is timed and zoned, then TIME (FSP) WITH TIME ZONE.
iv) If JDT is timed and not zoned, then TIME (FSP) WITHOUT TIME ZONE.
v) If JDT is dated but not timed and not zoned, then DATE.
...
(RR/RRRR specifiers explanation)
9.43 Converting a formatted character string to a datetime
...
5) Let NOW be the value of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP.
Let CY be the YEAR field of NOW.
Let CYLIT be an <unsigned integer> of four <digit>s whose value is CY.
Let CM be the MONTH field of NOW.
Let CMLIT be an <unsigned integer> of two <digit>s whose value is CM.
6) Case:
a) If CT contains a <datetime template year> YY, then:
i) Let YYPOS be an <exact numeric literal> whose value is the regular
expression position of YY.
ii) Let YYSTR be the result of SUBSTRING_REGEX ( RX IN FCS GROUP YYPOS )
iii) Let YYLEN be the length of YYSTR.
iv) Let YYPREFIX be the first (4 – YYLEN) digits of CYLIT.
NOTE 471 — If the length of YYSTR is 4, then YYPREFIX is a
zero-length string.
v) Let YYYY be the result of YYPREFIX || YYSTR
vi) Let YEAR be the value of YYYY interpreted as an <unsigned integer>.
b) If CT contains a <datetime template rounded year> RR, then:
i) Let RRPOS be an <exact numeric literal> whose value is the regular
expression position of RR.
ii) Let RRSTR be the result of SUBSTRING_REGEX ( RX IN FCS GROUP RRPOS )
iii) Let RRLEN be the length of RRSTR.
iv) Let RY be an implementation-defined exact numeric value of scale 0
(zero) that is between CY–100 and CY+100, inclusive. Let RYLIT be
an <unsigned integer> of four <digit>s whose value is RY.
v) Let RRPREFIX be the first (4 – RRLEN) digits of RYLIT.
NOTE 472 — If the length of RRSTR is 4, then RRPREFIX is a zero-length
string.
vi) Let RRRR be the result of RRPREFIX || RRSTR
vii) Let YEAR be the value of RRRR interpreted as an <unsigned integer>.
c) Otherwise, let YEAR be CY.
--
Nikita Glukhov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-01-08 01:38:20 | Re: heads up: Fix for intel hardware bug will lead to performance regressions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-07 23:38:36 | Re: Condition variable live lock |