Re: signal handling in plpython

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Mario De Frutos Dieguez <mariodefrutos(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: signal handling in plpython
Date: 2016-10-14 13:22:12
Message-ID: 9720.1476451332@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 10/14/2016 04:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Py_AddPendingCall is safe to call from a signal handler? That would
>>> be ... quite remarkable.

> Yes, I believe it is.

> https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/4b71e63b0616aa2a44c9b13675e4c8e3c0157481/Python/ceval.c#L422

I don't know whether to laugh or cry, but that code is a joke. Just
silently fail if you can't get the lock?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-10-14 13:53:02 Re: Question about behavior of snapshot too old feature
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-10-14 13:17:33 Re: signal handling in plpython