Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... however, it seems reasonable to assume that the *new* tuple is just
>> local storage. Why don't you just poke the old tuple's OID into the new
>> one before comparing?
> OK, that will be easy enough. I assume I should still put InvalidOid
> back again afterwards, in case someone downstream relies on it.
Can't imagine what ...
regards, tom lane