| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
| Date: | 2023-11-09 14:41:53 |
| Message-ID: | 96e3b739-d63d-4d35-90a3-7869465b7167@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.11.23 00:12, Michael Paquier wrote:
> - Should the subdirectory pg_basebackup be renamed into something more
> generic at this point? All these things are frontend tools that deal
> in some way with the replication protocol to do their work. Say
> a replication_tools?
Seems like unnecessary churn. Nobody has complained about any of the
other tools in there.
> - And if it would be better to refactor some of the code generic to
> all these streaming tools to fe_utils. What makes streamutil.h a bit
> less pluggable are all its extern variables to control the connection,
> but perhaps that can be an advantage, as well, in some cases.
Does anyone outside of pg_basebackup + existing friends + new friend
need that? Seems like extra complications.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2023-11-09 14:58:48 | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-11-09 14:39:32 | Re: meson documentation build open issues |