Re: Different memory allocation strategy in Postgres 11?

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Different memory allocation strategy in Postgres 11?
Date: 2018-10-30 07:10:34
Message-ID: 96bfc389-120c-8e7e-b9aa-6dc70f2b03a4@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thomas Munro schrieb am 26.10.2018 um 22:13:
>>> I typically configure "shared_buffers = 4096MB" on my 16GB system as sometimes when testing, it pays off to have a bigger cache.
>>>
>>> With Postgres 10 and earlier, the Postgres process(es) would only allocate that memory from the operating system when needed.
>>> So right after startup, it would only consume several hundred MB, not the entire 4GB
>>>
>>> However with Postgres 11 I noticed that it immediately grabs the complete memory configured for shared_buffers during startup.
>>>
>>> It's not really a big deal, but I wonder if that is an intentional change or a result from something else?
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you have pg_prewarm in shared_preload_libraries?
>>
>> No. The only shared libraries are those for pg_stat_statemens
>
> Does your user have "Lock Pages in Memory" privilege? One thing that
> is new in 11 is huge AKA large page support, and the default is
> huge_pages=try. Not a Windows person myself but I believe that should
> succeed if you have that privilege and enough contiguous chunks of
> physical memory are available. If you set huge_pages=off does it
> revert to the old behaviour?

Turns out this was an "optimization" in Windows 10, and completely unrelated to Postgres.

Windows 10 has a feature called "Fast Boot" (or something along the lines).

When that is activated (which it is by default), a proper shutdown of the system does not seem to really shut it down. This is especially noteworthy with services: they don't get a shutdown event (which e.g. means even a service marked as "manual start", will still be running after a reboot if it did before)

In case of Postgres this is visible e.g. in the logfile, because there will no shutdown or startup messages.

So when I booted my laptop, Postgres continued where it was before the reboot - and the memory usage was caused caused by myself generating test data using generate_series() but I expected a "clean" state after the reboot.

When manually restarting the service everything works as expected.

Sorry for the noise.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-10-30 07:30:22 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
Previous Message Christoph Moench-Tegeder 2018-10-29 21:37:50 Re: rw_redis_fdw: SQL Errors when statement is within a function