| From: | David E(dot) Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Filipp Krylov <phil(at)krylov(dot)eu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: JSONPath Child Operator? |
| Date: | 2023-01-30 15:57:13 |
| Message-ID: | 96E286D8-A44A-44F3-8FD4-4F875D9B66B6@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 30, 2023, at 08:17, Filipp Krylov <phil(at)krylov(dot)eu> wrote:
>> My question: Are there plans to support square bracket syntax for JSON object field name strings like this? Or to update to follow the standard as it’s finalized?
>
> This syntax is a part of "jsonpath syntax extensions" patchset: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e0fe4f7b-da0b-471c-b3da-d8adaf314357%40postgrespro.ru
Nice, thanks. I learned since sending this email that SQL/JSON Path is not at all the same as plain JSON Path, so now I’m less concerned bout it. I like the new object subscript syntax, though, I’ve been thinking about this myself.
D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sébastien Lardière | 2023-01-30 16:05:36 | Re: Timeline ID hexadecimal format |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-01-30 15:44:29 | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |