From: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, General postgres mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_activity xact_start and autovacuum |
Date: | 2008-02-11 23:43:46 |
Message-ID: | 96B09899-C642-4845-8433-D3C231806C0B@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Feb 11, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Actually it's not just autovacuum; it's any lazy vacuum. It's hard to
> tell those processes apart in pg_stat_activity. Perhaps we could have
> added a column in pg_stat_activity indicating processes that don't
> hold
> old tuples, but I feel that would have been a little too much.
I don't think it'd be too hard to construct a regex that would catch
all vacuums, after which you could throw out FULLs. I'm thinking
something like
\s*vacuum((\s+full){0,1}\s+\S+){0,1};{0,1}
Where \s indicates whitespace and \S indicates not whitespace (sorry,
don't have a regex manual handy...)
You could probably even simplify that to
\s*vacuum(\s+full){0}
Of course, you'd want to perform all of those in a case-insensitive
manner.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-02-11 23:50:41 | Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer? |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-02-11 23:38:46 | DBD::Pg 2.0.0 released |