Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce
Date: 2008-01-21 18:36:14
Message-ID: 9695.1200940574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> writes:
> You don't need to set up all the machines this way, only the one where
> you actually write and test the SPEC file.

Well, actually, I'm fairly unhappy that Devrim's skipping the "make
check" step while building those RPMs (which he must do because it
won't work as root). So there seems to me to be plenty of argument
for fixing the build farm too.

But yeah, the immediate point is development of a new package's
specfile, which you'd hardly do on a server farm.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mac_man2005 2008-01-21 18:42:24 Polyphase Merge
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-21 18:30:29 Re: contrib like modules in Red Hat problem, Re: A "bug" report for orafce