Re: Internationalisation (i18n) with Postgres as backend

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch>, Steve Baldwin <steve(dot)baldwin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: postgre <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Internationalisation (i18n) with Postgres as backend
Date: 2021-06-02 08:38:26
Message-ID: 96915d0c324145f661eca9298d4de90d2df43cd7.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 23:08 +0000, Laura Smith wrote:
> I didn't consider hstore, I did consider jsonb though.
>
> The thing that made me lean towards individual rows rather than consolidated was
> that I thought versioning would ultimately be easier/cleaner to achieve with
> individual rows (e.g. using tsrange & gist exclude). But willing to be proven wrong.

Your intuition is good. Don't use JSON for that, and don't use the outdated
hstore extension in particular.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2021-06-02 08:43:42 Re: Internationalisation (i18n) with Postgres as backend
Previous Message Laura Smith 2021-06-02 07:08:04 Re: Internationalisation (i18n) with Postgres as backend