Planning for beta (was Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Planning for beta (was Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions)
Date: 2004-07-25 03:22:59
Message-ID: 9682.1090725779@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Other than the spectacular lack of documentation, I don't think we are
>> in bad shape at all.

> OK, that helps. Alvaro had a number of items floating around and I
> wasn't sure where he was on them. Same with PITR. Once the number of
> open items for a project is over about six, I get lost. Is there a
> sense you and the patch authors have identified them all and are working
> on them so I don't have to worry about them? I don't care if they
> aren't done as much as I don't want them to be forgotten.

I think we know what we have to do. Alvaro, Simon, do you feel that
we are on track for beta at the end of the month? Could you post
your current to-do lists for NT and PITR?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-25 03:33:38 Quick coding question with acl fixes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-25 03:12:03 Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions