| From: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> |
| Subject: | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |
| Date: | 2024-10-02 09:47:42 |
| Message-ID: | 965715a9-fff2-4cf7-9e27-854c8a6594d6@uni-muenster.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02.10.24 06:48, Hunaid Sohail wrote:
> Should I revert to the v34 docs for Session User, or is it fine as is?
What I tried to say is that the current description is a bit vague ---
specially "Authenticated User".
> Authenticated User: The name of the user returned by PQuser()
> Session User: The session user's name.
I thought it would be nice to have a description that tells how both
Session and Authenticated users differ. IMHO *only* a reference to
PQuser() doesn't say much, but others might be ok with it. So let's see
what the other reviewers say.
--
Jim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2024-10-02 10:00:39 | Re: pg_basebackup and error messages dependent on the order of the arguments |
| Previous Message | Alexey Orlov | 2024-10-02 09:43:03 | Re: Patch: Show queries of processes holding a lock |