| From: | Vivekanand Joshi <vjoshi(at)zetainteractive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance issues |
| Date: | 2015-03-18 17:31:15 |
| Message-ID: | 9650933705b1a197888f77acbef26728@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
So, here is the first taste of success and which gives me the confidence
that if properly worked out with a good hardware and proper tuning,
PostgreSQL could be a good replacement.
Out of the 9 reports which needs to be migrated in PostgreSQL, 3 are now
running.
Report 4 was giving an issue and I will see it tomorrow.
Just to inform you guys that, the thing that helped most is setting
enable_nestloops to false worked. Plans are now not miscalculated.
But this is not a production-suitable setting. So what do you think how to
get a work around this?
Regards,
Vivek
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tomas Vondra
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 9:00 PM
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance issues
On 17.3.2015 16:24, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Tomas Vondra schrieb am 17.03.2015 um 15:43:
>> On 17.3.2015 15:19, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>>> Tomas Vondra schrieb am 17.03.2015 um 14:55:
>>>> (2) using window functions, e.g. like this:
>>>>
>>>> SELECT * FROM (
>>>> SELECT *,
>>>> ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY touchpoint_execution_id
>>>> ORDER BY FROM max_creation_dt) AS rn
>>>> FROM s_f_touchpoint_execution_status_history
>>>> ) foo WHERE rn = 1
>>>>
>>>> But estimating this is also rather difficult ...
>>>
>>>
>>> From my experience rewriting something like the above using DISTINCT
>>> ON is usually faster.
>>
>> How do you get the last record (with respect to a timestamp column)
>> using a DISTINCT ON?
>
> You need to use "order by ... desc". See here:
> http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/d4846/2
Nice, thanks!
>
> Btw: your row_number() usage wouldn't return the "latest" row either.
> It would return the "oldest" row.
Oh, right. I forgot the DESC in the window.
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Felipe Santos | 2015-03-18 17:51:06 | Re: Performance issues |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-03-18 17:16:20 | Re: views much slower in 9.3 than 8.4 |