Re: initdb recommendations

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: initdb recommendations
Date: 2019-05-23 16:54:27
Message-ID: 96389374-9454-d26d-6f79-7c7b15ec14bd@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 2019-04-06 20:08, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> I think we should just change the defaults. There is a risk of warning
>>> fatigue. initdb does warn about this, so anyone who cared could have
>>> gotten the information.
>>>
>>
>> I've been suggesting that for years, so definite strong +1 for doing that.
>
> +1

To recap, the idea here was to change the default authentication methods
that initdb sets up, in place of "trust".

I think the ideal scenario would be to use "peer" for local and some
appropriate password method (being discussed elsewhere) for host.

Looking through the buildfarm, I gather that the only platforms that
don't support peer are Windows, AIX, and HP-UX. I think we can probably
figure out some fallback or alternative default for the latter two
platforms without anyone noticing. But what should the defaults be on
Windows? It doesn't have local sockets, so the lack of peer wouldn't
matter. But is it OK to default to a password method, or would that
upset people particularly?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-05-23 16:56:49 Re: initdb recommendations
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2019-05-22 16:04:48 error: unrecognized privilege: 39 sql state: xx000

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-05-23 16:56:49 Re: initdb recommendations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-05-23 16:50:53 Re: nitpick about useless floating point division in gimme_edge_table