Re: Instability with incremental backup tests (pg_combinebackup, 003_timeline.pl)

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Instability with incremental backup tests (pg_combinebackup, 003_timeline.pl)
Date: 2024-08-06 12:53:09
Message-ID: 962847b5-a6e6-44c2-9b40-789b2a7c29b6@vondra.me
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/6/24 07:48, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> dikkop has reported a failure with the regression tests of pg_combinebackup:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dikkop&dt=2024-08-04%2010%3A04%3A51
>
> That's in the test 003_timeline.pl, from dc212340058b:
> # Failed test 'incremental backup from node1'
> # at t/003_timeline.pl line 43.
>
> The node is extremely slow, so perhaps bumping up the timeout would be
> fine enough in this case (did not spend time analyzing it). I don't
> think that this has been discussed, but perhaps I just missed a
> reference to it and the incremental backup thread is quite large.
>

Yeah, it's a freebsd running on rpi4, from a USB flash disk, and in my
experience it's much slower than rpi4 running Linux. I'm not sure why is
that, never found a way to make it faster

The machine already has:

export PGCTLTIMEOUT=600
export PG_TEST_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT=600

I doubt increasing it further will do the trick. Maybe there's some
other timeout that I should increase?

FWIW I just moved the buildfarm stuff to a proper SSD disk (still USB,
but hopefully better than the crappy flash disk).

regards

--
Tomas Vondra

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Pegoraro 2024-08-06 13:57:00 Re: Detailed release notes
Previous Message Amul Sul 2024-08-06 12:37:04 Re: pg_combinebackup does not detect missing files