"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is the nuance that in reality a non-superuser cannot specify BypassRLS even
> if the effective value is unchanged unimportant here?
I was wondering about that. You could definitely make a case for a
weaker set of rules here. However, the superuser restriction has been
like that for 15-ish years without much complaint, so it doesn't seem
that it bothers people in practice.
regards, tom lane