| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Srini Raghavan" <sixersrini(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Database file copy |
| Date: | 2011-01-14 19:15:58 |
| Message-ID: | 9614.1295032558@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> If we're going to be supporting that long term, we should probably
> change the note about FREEZE being deprecated, though.
> So, still +1 on removing the wording about FREEZE being deprecated,
> but instead we should mention what actually *is* deprecated (the
> omission of the parentheses).
If we're going to do that, we should deprecate the unparenthesized
syntax altogether, with an eye to de-reserving VERBOSE and ANALYZE
as well.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-14 19:29:53 | Re: limiting hint bit I/O |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-14 19:13:51 | Re: limiting hint bit I/O |