From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open 7.4 items |
Date: | 2003-10-05 18:59:08 |
Message-ID: | 9614.1065380348@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not really, it was still up in the air I thought. However, the
>> discussion will become moot if we don't have an implementation
>> of the faster-checking alternative to look at pretty soon. Do you
>> have something nearly ready to show?
> It's not cleaned up, but yes. It appears to work for the simple tests I've
> done and should fall back if the permissions don't work to do a single
> query on both tables.
Okay, I'll look this over, make any improvements I can think of, and
post another version in a couple of hours. One thing I can see I'd
like to do is merge the error-reporting code with the main line, so
that there's not any difference in the output format (I don't like
the induced change in the regression test outputs...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-10-05 19:11:50 | Re: count(*) slow on large tables |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-05 18:57:21 | Re: count(*) slow on large tables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-05 19:00:15 | Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-10-05 18:40:10 | Re: Open 7.4 items |