Re: Multi master use case?

From: Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists <oliver(dot)lists(at)gtwm(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multi master use case?
Date: 2012-01-28 19:52:02
Message-ID: 9612B2A3-CC33-403B-84E4-956EC251C30F@gtwm.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 28 Jan 2012, at 15:27, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:

>> Is this a case for multi master do you think?
>> I.e. running one on the internet, one locally.
>
> Yes, could be.
>
>> b) changing schemas (new tables, fields, views etc.) as well as data
>
> That's a tall order; I don't think anything will do that automatically,
> although rubyrep claims to at least pick up new tables.

OK, I guess I could treat one as 'schema master' and pg_dump schema + data across to the other once a night, once all activity has stopped and standard replication completed.

>
>> Any experiences/thoughts?
>
> My experience is with Bucardo, which should do the job admirably
> (but with the data only). My advice would be to just set up a test
> system and try rubyrep and Bucardo out. For the latter, use the
> latest Bucardo5 beta, as Bucardo4 will be deprecated soon:
>
> http://bucardo.org/downloads/Bucardo-4.99.3.tar.gz

Thanks, I'll do that.

Oliver
www.agilebase.co.uk

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Little, Douglas 2012-01-28 22:31:45 help with normalizing
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2012-01-28 18:11:03 Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!