From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP list rewrite |
Date: | 2004-05-24 03:04:52 |
Message-ID: | 961.1085367892@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> I've attached the latest list rewrite patch (gzip'ed, against current
> sources). Unfortunately, the compatibility API we defined earlier wasn't
> that effective: it was more efficient for me to look at more or less
> every lfirst() call site in the backend and rewrite it as necessary than
> to just start up the backend and wait for things to break.
I'm surprised you did that much work and did not fix things to
distinguish ListCell * from List * ... we're gonna have to make
another pass over all these places to do that.
I wonder whether it wasn't a bad idea to define the compatibility API
to try to gloss over the type difference between ListCell* and List*.
I have a strong suspicion that some of the "remaining bugs" you mention
would be caught by enabling the compiler to complain about using one
pointer type where the other is needed.
> It seems we're mangling pstate->p_namespace in parse_relation.c somehow,
> but I haven't managed to figure out why yet (any suggestions welcome)
Odd, the p_namespace manipulations look straightforward enough. I
wonder if this could be a double-evaluation issue?
> I'm working hard to get this finished by the end of this week.
Offer of help is still open, if you want to try to divvy up the
remaining work. I really want to see this get in.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-24 03:05:28 | Re: pg_autovacuum fixes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-24 02:47:45 | Re: pgstat exec cleanup |