From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure. |
Date: | 2024-07-23 02:11:59 |
Message-ID: | 960594.1721700719@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2024-07-22 Mo 12:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Masahiko Sawada<sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Looking at dodo's failures, it seems that while it passes
>>> module-xid_wraparound-check, all failures happened only during
>>> testmodules-install-check-C. Can we check the server logs written
>>> during xid_wraparound test in testmodules-install-check-C?
>> Oooh, that is indeed an interesting observation. There are enough
>> examples now that it's hard to dismiss it as chance, but why would
>> the two runs be different?
> It's not deterministic.
Perhaps. I tried "make check" on mamba's host and got exactly the
same failures as with "make installcheck", which counts in favor of
dodo's results being just luck. Still, dodo has now shown 11 failures
in "make installcheck" and zero in "make check", so it's getting hard
to credit that there's no difference.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tender Wang | 2024-07-23 02:15:47 | Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails |
Previous Message | Sutou Kouhei | 2024-07-23 01:54:55 | Re: Separate HEAP WAL replay logic into its own file |