Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xid_wraparound tests intermittent failure.
Date: 2024-07-23 02:11:59
Message-ID: 960594.1721700719@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2024-07-22 Mo 12:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Masahiko Sawada<sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Looking at dodo's failures, it seems that while it passes
>>> module-xid_wraparound-check, all failures happened only during
>>> testmodules-install-check-C. Can we check the server logs written
>>> during xid_wraparound test in testmodules-install-check-C?

>> Oooh, that is indeed an interesting observation. There are enough
>> examples now that it's hard to dismiss it as chance, but why would
>> the two runs be different?

> It's not deterministic.

Perhaps. I tried "make check" on mamba's host and got exactly the
same failures as with "make installcheck", which counts in favor of
dodo's results being just luck. Still, dodo has now shown 11 failures
in "make installcheck" and zero in "make check", so it's getting hard
to credit that there's no difference.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tender Wang 2024-07-23 02:15:47 Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Previous Message Sutou Kouhei 2024-07-23 01:54:55 Re: Separate HEAP WAL replay logic into its own file