Re: safer node casting

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: safer node casting
Date: 2017-01-26 22:27:45
Message-ID: 9604.1485469665@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> #if defined(USE_ASSERT_CHECKING) && defined(PG_USE_INLINE)
> is probably a better gatekeeper in the back-branches, than gcc?

Ah, yeah, that would work --- I'd already swapped out that business ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-01-26 22:28:33 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-01-26 22:24:46 Re: safer node casting