From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test |
Date: | 2022-02-24 12:19:39 |
Message-ID: | 95fdebab-adaa-4d00-165b-e58b9b63b94d@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/23/22 20:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 23.02.22 23:58, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>>>> libpq TAP tests should be in src/interfaces/libpq/t/.
>>> That's failing to account for the fact that a libpq test can't
>>> really be a pure-perl TAP test; you need some C code to drive the
>>> library.
>> Such things could be put under src/interfaces/libpq/test, or some other
>> subdirectory. We already have src/interfaces/ecpg/test.
> OK, but then the TAP scripts are under src/interfaces/libpq/test/t,
> which isn't what you said. I have no great objection to moving
> src/test/modules/libpq_pipeline/ to src/interfaces/libpq/test/,
> though, as long as the buildfarm will cope.
>
>
It won't without some adjustment.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-02-24 12:23:55 | Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-02-24 12:18:36 | Re: Add id's to various elements in protocol.sgml |