Re: embedded postgresql

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
To: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: jini us <jiniusuk(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: embedded postgresql
Date: 2003-11-15 01:18:14
Message-ID: 95C89B84-1709-11D8-9BF4-000393CFE6B8@spy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Nov 14, 2003, at 15:43, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:

> LOL, I was just composing and then aborted an answer mentioning
> mindsets and it
> being natural to me.

[...]

> Write a library that provides the API required to which the app. can
> be linked
> but which chats/controls the server.

Haha. I was just having this conversation with a co-worker. I was
suggesting writing a -lpqembed and giving it out as the ``embedded
solution.''

Because really, who would care about the difference?

Now, if only I had a use for such a thing...

--
Dustin Sallings

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-15 02:13:10 Re: Can Postgresql run under Windows?
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2003-11-15 01:07:40 Re: ATA disks and RAID controllers for database servers