Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date: 2017-03-10 00:10:06
Message-ID: 959ff87c-a207-846a-cccb-f5723d7cca58@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> I updated the patch. Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in
>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on
>> partitioned tables at all.
>
> This patch no longer applies.

Rebased patch is attached.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-03-10 00:14:34 Re: [PATCH] Teach Catalog.pm how many attributes there should be per DATA() line
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-03-09 23:59:23 Re: contrib modules and relkind check