Re: bug in permission handling?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Martin Renters <martin(at)datafax(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug in permission handling?
Date: 2002-01-26 06:24:29
Message-ID: 9595.1012026269@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I was going to run up a patch for this, but it wold be premature given
> the introduction of schemas in 7.3. Once implemented, it would be trivial
> to add a test of schema ownership and incorporate this into the idea
> above.

Unfortunately, looking into databases you aren't connected to is far
from trivial. As long as users span multiple databases this problem
is not really soluble...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-01-26 08:08:22 Re: sequence indexes
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2002-01-26 05:27:32 Re: bug in permission handling?