| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: on placeholder entries in view rule action query's range table |
| Date: | 2023-01-12 16:01:42 |
| Message-ID: | 959239.1673539302@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> What about also including a dump from an old version, too ?
> Then the upgrade test can test actual upgrades.
The BF clients already do that (if enabled), but they work from
up-to-date installations of the respective branch tips. I'd not
want to have some branches including hypothetical output of
other branches, because it'd be too easy for those files to get
out of sync and deliver misleading answers.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) | 2023-01-12 16:13:47 | RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-01-12 15:57:07 | Re: on placeholder entries in view rule action query's range table |