Re: Deprecating RULES

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Tom and Simon wrote:
>> If you want to get rid of rules, build the
>> replacement; don't just try to be a pain in the ass to users.

> Supporting broken and non-standard features *is* a pain in the ass to
> users, since they are sometimes persuaded to use them and then regret
> it. Or if they do, hit later problems.

Broken? That's a strong word. Tricky perhaps. Best avoided by novices, yes.
But broken? Do they not work exactly as described in the fine manual?
FWIW, I still see them a lot in the wild.

> Anyway, lets start with a discussion of what rules give us
> that SQL standard features do not?

Even if the answer is nothing, if we do not implement the SQL standard
feature yet (exhibit A: updateable views), it's a moot point unless
the goal is to spur development of those features just so we can
deprecate rules.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201210112251
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlB3hx8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSshhwQCfdtKc7R2i0kz7eDUTXtik93k3
KyEAoK0dQVZsfcAD3OlHYDVhWMjst8QZ
=xY2L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----