| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: We are getting old |
| Date: | 2021-03-07 21:32:03 |
| Message-ID: | 955709b0-b132-c209-f196-1234979ba950@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 3/7/21 9:17 AM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 3/7/21 1:14 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 7 Mar 2021, at 12:48, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> Should we regularly update that sentence, or anchor it with an actual date?
>>
>> Including a date with appropriate resolution seems better.
>
> I wouldn't be against just saying "the 80's", perhaps with some
> superfluous neon
Technically, the above falls in the purview of -docs as it's in the docs
themselves, though we do link to it from pgweb.
To compare, -www[1] says "over 30 years of active development" so we
could certainly increment the decade count.
I'd also be completely for lifting the first two sentences from [1] and
placing them in the documentation.
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-07 23:32:27 | Re: We are getting old |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-03-07 14:17:47 | Re: We are getting old |