| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dubious warning: FORMAT JSON has no effect for json and jsonb types |
| Date: | 2023-08-18 05:59:34 |
| Message-ID: | 954243a2-45d6-f1cf-6e2c-8db66b58ce4c@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.08.23 16:59, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org
> <mailto:peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>> wrote:
>
> This warning comes from parse_expr.c transformJsonValueExpr() and is
> triggered for example by the following test case:
>
> SELECT JSON_OBJECT('foo': NULL::json FORMAT JSON);
> WARNING: FORMAT JSON has no effect for json and jsonb types
>
> But I don't see anything in the SQL standard that would require this
> warning. It seems pretty clear that FORMAT JSON in this case is
> implicit and otherwise without effect.
>
> Also, we don't have that warning in the output case (RETURNING json
> FORMAT JSON).
>
> Anyone remember why this is here? Should we remove it?
>
>
> +1 for removing, on the basis that it is not suprising, and would
> pollute logs for most configurations.
done
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | torikoshia | 2023-08-18 06:40:57 | Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-08-18 05:11:47 | Re: Rethink the wait event names for postgres_fdw, dblink and etc |