| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mason Hale" <masonhale(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problem loading pg_dump file |
| Date: | 2007-02-01 00:42:26 |
| Message-ID: | 9518.1170290546@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Mason Hale" <masonhale(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Then I noticed was that our original dump file from 1 week ago was 7GB, and
> the one today was 14GB.
> We've had a lot of db activity, but I doubt our database has doubled in size
> in just one week.
> Now I'm thinking that the 7GB dump file was somehow truncated or aborted
> before it was finished. (I ran the pg_dump as a background job, and didn't
> capture the output... so there may have been an error I didn't see).
> Does this file truncation theory sound consistent with the symptoms I
> reported? Or does the 'single corrupted row of data' theory ring truer?
Hmm ... truncation would explain the weird pg_restore error, I think,
but not the problem where it seemed to be misinterpreting the first
row of COPY data.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Lambert | 2007-02-01 01:24:51 | Re: How to allow users to log on only from my application not from pgadmin |
| Previous Message | Ben | 2007-01-31 23:17:40 | Re: replication choices |