| From: | "David Wall" <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | MySQL has transactions |
| Date: | 2001-01-24 04:30:10 |
| Message-ID: | 94llnn$24kr$1@news.tht.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Now that MySQL has transaction support through Berkeley DB lib, and it's
always had way more data types, what are the main advantages postgresql has
over it? I don't think mysql has subselects and such, but they did add a
master-slave replication feature as well as online reorganization (perhaps
locks tables like vacuum?).
Anybody used both of the current releases who can comment?
Thanks,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-24 04:37:23 | Re: VACUUM ANALYZE FAILS on 7.0.3 |
| Previous Message | Ian Harding | 2001-01-24 04:00:51 | Re: Inserting and incrementing with MAX aggregate |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-01-24 04:32:02 | Re: WAL documentation |
| Previous Message | bpalmer | 2001-01-24 04:19:56 | Re: $PGDATA/base/??? |