| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2019-04-16 06:50:31 |
| Message-ID: | 94fd4ca1-0a5b-266d-0cc9-05b6396dffda@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-04-16 08:19, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> I don't have any comments on the code (but the test looks sensible, it's
>> the same trick I used to discover the issue in the first place).
>
> After thinking some more on it, this behavior looks rather sensible to
> me. Are there any objections?
Looks good to me.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-04-16 06:55:05 | Re: Commit message / hash in commitfest page. |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2019-04-16 06:47:27 | Re: Commit message / hash in commitfest page. |