Re: update returning order by syntax error question

On 9/12/19 6:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org> writes:
>> It's almost as if the parser sees "update" as a possible
>> table name (rather than a reserved word) and "tblname"
>> as the alias for that table and it's expecting a comma
>> or left/right/full etc. when it seess the "t".
>
> No, it's *exactly* as if that. UPDATE is an unreserved
> keyword so it's fully legitimate as a table name.
> If you made the syntax be what the grammar is expecting:
>
> regression=# select * from (update t cross join update t2);
> ERROR: relation "update" does not exist
> LINE 1: select * from (update t cross join update t2);

I am not following.
PostgreSQL 11.5

The OP had:

with u as
(update tblname t set ... where ... returning ...)
select * from u order by ...;

I tested with:

WITH u AS (
UPDATE up_test t SET col_2 = col_2 + 1 WHERE id < 3
RETURNING *
)
SELECT * FROM u;
BEGIN
id | col1 | col_2
----+------+-------
1 | t | 2
2 | NULL | 3
(2 rows)

I'm missing something.

> ^
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com