On 2/26/21 11:39 AM, Rumpi Gravenstein wrote:
> Tom
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. What you stated is what I was expecting.
> I've searched high and low for the documentation that proves that point
> -- something I need to do to satisfy our legal team. Any thoughts on
> under which rock that license language exists?
>
> Best Regards,
> Rumpi
>
Hm, make legal prove it isn't FOSS.