From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Remove last traces of HPPA support |
Date: | 2023-10-21 06:22:43 |
Message-ID: | 94A1B487-1F1C-4B09-B4B9-B1AA03BBED2A@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On October 20, 2023 11:18:19 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> It'd be one thing to continue supporting an almost-guaranteed-to-be-unused
>> platform, if we expected it to become more popular or complete enough to be
>> usable like e.g. risc-v a few years ago. But I doubt we'll find anybody out
>> there believing that there's a potential future upward trend for HPPA.
>
>Indeed. I would have bet that Postgres on HPPA was extinct in the wild,
>until I noticed this message a few days ago:
>
>https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/BYAPR02MB42624ED41C15BFA82DAE2C359BD5A%40BYAPR02MB4262.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
>
>But we already cut that user off at the knees by removing HP-UX support.
Not that it matters really, but I'd assume that was hpux on ia64, not hppa?
Greetings,
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-21 06:32:06 | Re: Remove last traces of HPPA support |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-21 06:18:19 | Re: Remove last traces of HPPA support |