From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2025-03-01 20:48:18 |
Message-ID: | 948dd810f942016c22ffe9bb4500677299553c59.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 13:52 -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > Can you expand on some of those cases?
>
> Certainly. I think one of the problems is that because this patch is
> solving a pg_upgrade issue, the focus is on the "dump and restore"
> scenarios. But pg_dump is used for much more than that, especially
> "dump and examine".
Thank you for going through these examples.
> I just don't think it should be enabled by default for everything
> using pg_dump. For the record, I would not strongly object to having
> stats on by default for binary dumps, although I would prefer them
> off.
I am open to that idea, I just want to get it right, because probably
whatever the default is in 18 will stay that way.
Also, we will need to think through the set of pg_dump options again. A
lot of our tools seem to assume that "if it's the default, we don't
need a way to ask for it explicitly", which makes it a lot harder to
ever change the default and keep a coherent set of options.
> So why not just expect people to modify their programs to use --no-
> statistics for cases like this? That's certainly an option, but it's
> going to break a lot of existing things, and create branching code:
I suggest that we wait a bit to see what additional feedback we get
early in beta.
> Also, anything trained to parse pg_dump output will have to learn
> about the new SELECT pg_restore_ calls with their multi-line formats
> (not 100% sure we don't have that anywhere, as things like "SELECT
> setval" and "SELECT set_config" are single line, but there may be
> existing things)
That's an interesting point. What tools are currrently trying to parse
pg_dump output?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-01 21:23:39 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Previous Message | Ed Behn | 2025-03-01 20:32:47 | Re: access numeric data in module |