From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Philip Poles" <philip(at)surfen(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: int8 and hash index |
Date: | 2000-06-19 04:10:45 |
Message-ID: | 9465.961387845@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> "Philip Poles" <philip(at)surfen(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm having some trouble using a hash index on an INT8 field in
>> postgres7.0(release):
> Looks like we don't have a hash function defined for int8 :-(.
> This is going to have to stay broken until 7.1, given our rule
> against changing system catalogs for subreleases. Sorry.
Turns out that we do have an int8 hash function, but for some reason
its entry in pg_amproc is missing. If you need this problem fixed
before 7.1, you just need to do this:
insert into pg_amproc values(405, 754, 949, 1);
Note this only affects the database you do it in, not others in the same
installation ... but if you do it in template1 then subsequently-created
databases will have the entry too.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | T.J.Farrell | 2000-06-19 04:18:10 | Re: Read an already existing DB: functions & triggers. |
Previous Message | Brett W. McCoy | 2000-06-18 22:20:52 | Re: Auto-increment Numeric Primary keys |