Re: stress test for parallel workers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date: 2019-10-13 14:57:33
Message-ID: 942.1570978653@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-10-13 10:29:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> How recent do you think it needs to be?

> My experience reporting kernel bugs is that the latest released version,
> or even just the tip of the git tree, is your best bet :/.

Considering that we're going to point them at chapter and verse in
Torvald's own repo, I do not think they can claim that we're worried
about obsolete code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-10-13 16:07:13 Re: stress test for parallel workers
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-10-13 14:51:06 Re: v12.0 ERROR: trying to store a heap tuple into wrong type of slot