| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Donald Fraser <demolish(at)cwgsy(dot)net>, "[ADMIN]" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: uppercase = lowercase |
| Date: | 2003-02-19 07:51:33 |
| Message-ID: | 9409.1045641093@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> We get this question a lot, usually from folks converting from mysql.
> Do any of the core folks think this is worth adding to contrib? Or
> perhaps a project on gborg would be more appropriate?
In the long run, the correct SQL-spec-compliant solution is selectable
collation for each column, and then you could specify a case-insensitive
collation for the columns you want to act this way. But I don't really
foresee that happening in the near future :-(. In the meantime, a
specialized datatype seems like an okay hack.
I'd not favor putting it into the core distribution, because that would
amount to a commitment to support it indefinitely, which I don't want
to make. contrib would be iffy for the same reason --- contrib tends
to have a subtext of "this might be mainstream someday, if it gets
polished up". gborg, no problem.
But that's just my $0.02. Comments anyone?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2003-02-19 10:02:46 | Re: log file maintenance |
| Previous Message | Charles Hornberger | 2003-02-18 23:42:22 | Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 + PAM = authentication failure? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Donald Fraser | 2003-02-19 11:02:44 | Re: uppercase = lowercase |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-19 01:36:37 | Fw: [HACKERS] Real-world usage example |