| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mike Pultz" <mike(at)mikepultz(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: smallserial / serial2 |
| Date: | 2011-04-21 14:26:16 |
| Message-ID: | 9405.1303395976@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Mike Pultz" <mike(at)mikepultz(dot)com> writes:
> I use tables all the time that have sequences on smallint's;
> I'd like to simplify my create files by not having to create the sequence
> first, but I also don't want to give up those 2 bytes per column!
A sequence that can only go to 32K doesn't seem all that generally
useful ...
Are you certain that you're really saving anything? More likely than
not, the "saved" 2 bytes are going to disappear into alignment padding
of a later column or of the whole tuple. Even if it really does help
for your case, that's another reason to doubt that it's generally
useful.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2011-04-21 14:31:15 | Re: hot backups: am I doing it wrong, or do we have a problem with pg_clog? |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-04-21 14:05:43 | Re: hot backups: am I doing it wrong, or do we have a problem with pg_clog? |