From: | Dot Yet <dot(dot)yet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Keaton Adams <kadams(at)mxlogic(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Product Roadmap question and request for recommendation |
Date: | 2009-02-23 18:20:25 |
Message-ID: | 93bc4af40902231020o442c1d5ch5059cb1e21c35a0b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
don't fix if it ain't broken ;)
no really, if the system is capable of working nearly flawlessly till 8.4 is
baked, then it is sound to wait till then, especially when upgrading to a
newer version is a *painful* as in time consuming task. i am assuming
downgrading (just incase things don't workout that easily) will be equally
painful.
rgds,
dotyet.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Keaton Adams <kadams(at)mxlogic(dot)com> wrote:
> What would you do in this situation?
>
> We are currently at PG 8.1 and are in the process of upgrading to 8.3.6. I
> read on your development roadmap page that 8.4 is slated for release in Q1
> of this year, possibly on the 31st of March:
>
> "The next release of PostgreSQL is planned to be the 8.4 release. A
> tentative schedule for this version has a release in the first quarter of
> 2009."
>
> I have also read in the postings that the framework for in-place upgrades
> is being added to 8.4, so the actual upgrade to the forthcoming 8.5 can be
> done as in-place (without dump/restore), but there won't be a way to do an
> in-place upgrade from any 8.3.x version directly to 8.5.
>
> Upgrading some of our larger databases is rather painful and is a several
> day effort (staging historical data over time so the actual cutover can
> realistically be done in a weekend). Right now 8.1 is working well for us,
> is extremely stable, and provides all of the functionality we need to
> support our applications. Given this, it sounds to me like it makes sense to
> wait a bit longer (2nd half of this year) for a 8.4.x version do to the
> dump/restore against for the last time so we can then, in the future, do
> in-place upgrades from 8.5 onward.
>
> Any comments you can make on this suggestion would be very much
> appreciated.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-02-23 19:02:32 | Re: Function that returns Boolean |
Previous Message | Richard Broersma | 2009-02-23 18:15:18 | Re: Function that returns Boolean |