Re: Proposed Feature

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed Feature
Date: 2007-06-23 18:46:45
Message-ID: 93BDCFC2-8EB7-4CD7-9EDA-2ADA6BE88E27@blighty.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jun 23, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>
>> I fully agree with the not part of the default installation. And
>> make it
>> easy to turn the thing off.
>>
>> In that respect it sound like a good feature for developer systems
>> (not
>> servers per se). Just ensure for a small memory footprint, preferably
>> within a few 100 KB of memory. If you are going over 1 MB you are
>> seriously doing something wrong. (Obviously that might be acceptable
>> when I'm actively using it, but otherwise it should keep memory
>> usage as
>> low as resonably possible).
>
> Good point. I could hack it up in C# in 15 minutes, and it'd be a 32Kb
> EXE file. But it'd use 15-20Mb RAM at least, making it completely
> unacceptable of course. So that's absolutely an important figure.

For something with such trivial functionality, using your application
framework of choice (C#, Java, MFC, Qt, Delphi) is, however tempting,
not going to be a good fit, for dependency reasons as much as
resource usage.

But it's probably under a couple of hundred lines of c/win32, and
wouldn't be too hard to cobble together.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-06-23 21:04:53 Re: 8.2 contrib. "Full Disjunction"
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-06-23 18:06:46 Re: Proposed Feature