From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
Date: | 2013-05-13 19:16:17 |
Message-ID: | 9393.1368472577@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2013-05-13 14:48:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> DROPing and recreating a new index in --single mode isn't that
>>> uncommon...
>> Surely you'd just REINDEX it instead. Moreover, if it isn't a system
>> index already, why are you doing this in --single mode at all?
> The last case I had was that an index was corrupted in a way that
> autovacuum got stuck on the corrupt index and wasn't killable. Without
> single mode it was hard to be fast enough to drop the index before
> autovac grabbed the lock again.
Meh. Actually, after looking closer at xlog.c, the OID counter starts
out at FirstBootstrapObjectId, which is not what I'd been thinking.
So a value less than that must indicate wraparound, which presumably
never happens during initdb. We could just change the code to
if (ShmemVariableCache->nextOid < ((Oid) FirstBootstrapObjectId))
{
/* wraparound while in standalone environment */
ShmemVariableCache->nextOid = FirstNormalObjectId;
ShmemVariableCache->oidCount = 0;
}
which is a bit asymmetric-looking but should do the right thing in all
cases.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-05-13 19:52:43 | Re: Parallel Sort |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2013-05-13 19:11:56 | Re: Add more regression tests for dbcommands |