From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Testing with concurrent sessions |
Date: | 2010-01-11 17:42:08 |
Message-ID: | 937e45b32f294de87b7111b137224df0@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Is there a reason why you're suggesting using DBI? There is also the Pg
> perl module which works as well and is one tenth of the size. It also
> doesn't have external dependancies. It's just a plain wrapper around
> libpq, which for the purposes of testing may be better.
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~mergl/pgsql_perl5-1.9.0/Pg.pm
Works as well? Did you take a look at that link? The last update was
early 2000, which should give you an indication of just how dead
it is.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001111241
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAktLYtwACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjNJgCg1IZBNIZsUMZ2V83/NjgJnrGO
3NEAoK/w0byO45zmni/i9lnhliD4UpkU
=ndmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-11 17:54:10 | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-11 16:57:49 | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |