From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ? |
Date: | 2010-03-05 18:52:43 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e11003051052s547d04c2o6c314f09c0685ee4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 3/5/10, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/4/10 5:59 AM, damien clochard wrote:
>> While it's right to remove them from the professionnal support pages if
>> they don't do it anymore, the title of "silver sponsor" rewards
>> "Entities who have provided at least 1 full year of significant and
>> recurring contribution to PostgreSQL." which remains true.
>
> It would be fun to put Oracle there, but that seems like inviting trouble.
>
Yeah. Would it actually be in violation of their published trademark
policy though?
:-)
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-03-05 19:24:32 | Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-03-05 18:40:28 | Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ? |