Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ?
Date: 2010-03-05 18:52:43
Message-ID: 937d27e11003051052s547d04c2o6c314f09c0685ee4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 3/5/10, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/4/10 5:59 AM, damien clochard wrote:
>> While it's right to remove them from the professionnal support pages if
>> they don't do it anymore, the title of "silver sponsor" rewards
>> "Entities who have provided at least 1 full year of significant and
>> recurring contribution to PostgreSQL." which remains true.
>
> It would be fun to put Oracle there, but that seems like inviting trouble.
>

Yeah. Would it actually be in violation of their published trademark
policy though?

:-)

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-03-05 19:24:32 Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-03-05 18:40:28 Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ?