Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Kevin Flanagan <kevin-f(at)linkprior(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Date: 2010-03-05 09:16:16
Message-ID: 937d27e11003050116q2b7684cs2c779780e4490813@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

> How do _you_ go about building server extensions for Pg? Where do you
> get the headers for gettext etc?

Same place I get the binaries - gnuwin32 mostly.

> I'm increasingly thinking the win32 package _should_ be split into
> server binary and separate headers+pdb+sources packages, with the sdk
> package including gettext headers and sources too. It'd be a LOT easier
> to develop with Pg on win32 this way.

How does breaking it up into multiple packages make it easier?

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2010-03-05 09:31:49 Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-03-05 09:05:06 Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?