From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, webmaster <webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-12-3 |
Date: | 2009-12-03 15:08:59 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10912030708i73dd3aean6cf86c30345efca0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
2009/12/3 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Isn't there a single list of moderators available? I would have thought
>>> that if anyone isn't able to moderate anymore, they should be removed. This
>>> would allow assessment of the list size to determine whether others need to
>>> be sought to moderate in their stead.
>>
>> Depends what you mean by 'available'. I keep adding an removing people
>> from it, but it seems to be hard to get anyone to moderate in real
>> time, or even daily for any length of time.
>
> It's a pretty thankless job. I am a moderator for pgsql-rrreviewers
> and the only thing I ever do is reject spam. It could be set to
> auto-reject and we'd be no worse off - at least so far.
We're talking about the website - news, events, doc comments etc. Far
less spam there, more work checking that doc comments are correct, and
the news articles submitted meet the publication policy etc.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2009-12-03 16:03:40 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-12-3 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-12-03 15:07:51 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-12-3 |