From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited |
Date: | 2009-11-13 16:00:07 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10911130800t61f335c5x1742d0f082bd1781@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> I had a look at this some time ago and I must admit that I find it
>> pretty interesting. The technology choices make it
>> obviously impossible to merge -- not only the particular Perl modules
>> used, but the mere fact that Perl is used (and that such a recent
>> version is required). But you're already aware of all this so I'm not
>> going to say more.
>
> Really? Perl is a show-stopper? That seems harsh. Perl is pretty
> ubiquitous - in fact, given that we now support Windows, arguably more
> so than awk.
Building in VC++ on Windows already requires Perl. And if you're
building in mingw, you've probably already got it, or can get it
pretty easily.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-13 16:08:25 | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-13 15:55:27 | Re: next CommitFest |